Monday, December 5, 2011

Shaw Capital Management for Small Business Financing with Factoring

Financing a small business has always been challenging. Read this article to find out if factoring financing is the right solution for your small business. Learn from experts; refrain from internet offer scams and fraud.
Shaw Capital Management and Financing provide same-day-funding. We can help you meet your cashflow needs immediately without entering into a long term factoring relationship. The money you get for the freight bills we purchase is payment in full.

Small business owners have always had a tough time obtaining financing. Simply, most small businesses just can’t qualify for conventional business loans. The requirements are too onerous – the company must have sizable assets, multiple years of profitability and many times, it’s financial statements must be audited by a 3rd party.

Most business owners consider that a business loan is their only business financing alternative. When they get turned away, they give up any hope of obtaining financing. What most small business owners don’t know is that they do have alternatives – and – many times those alternatives can work better that conventional financing.

Let’s take a common cash flow challenge. Companies that sell products or services to other businesses usually have to wait between 30 and 60 days to get paid for their services. So, they incur the expenses of delivery immediately, but then wait a long time to recoup their investment. While this is fine for companies with adequate banking reserves, it is one of the major challenges that business owners face today. As a matter of fact, few startups plan for the fact that it takes 4 to 8 weeks to get paid, which not only limits their growth opportunities, but challenges their very survival as a business.

Now, most business owners would consider that the only solution to the previous problem is to get a loan or a line of credit. But there is another option – it’s called factoring financing. Few people have heard of it, so not many owners consider it if they fail to get a business loan.

Invoice factoring offers a very simple solution to the slow payments problem. Let’s say that you sold $10,000 worth of consulting services to a company. And let’s say that they’ll pay the $10,000 in about 45 days, which is the industry average. Now, what happens if you can’t wait because you need to meet payroll or make supplier payments? Well, you could sell the invoice to a factoring company. The factoring company would buy it from you in two installments. The first installment would be for 80% of the invoice, or $8000 in the case of our example. This is paid at invoicing.

The second installment, paid to you when your client actually pays the invoice, is the remaining 20%, less a fee. Using our example, it’d be $2000 minus the cost of the factoring service.

So factoring invoices offers you the following proposition: an immediate advance of about 80% at time of invoicing, and a second advance for the reminder (less fees) at the time of actual payment.

As you can see, factoring provides the needed working capital to meet business expenses without worrying about when your client will pay. It provides you with predictable cash flow, positioning your business for growth. And qualifying for factoring tends to be relatively easy. The biggest requirement (though not the only one) is that you must have a good roster of clients. By Marco Terry

Shaw Capital Management Investment Financial Market Summary 2010

Financial Markets: Sentiment in the financial markets
improved considerably over the past month. There was
less concern about the possibility of a move into a
“double-dip” recession; and fears about sovereign debt
defaults also eased.

The improvement in conditions intensified the debate
about the relative merits of austerity measures and
further stimulus in the current situation, and revealed
a significant difference in the approach of the Fed and
the European Central Bank.

Equity Markets: Most of the equity markets recovered
strongly from the falls that had occurred at the end of
June, helped by some encouraging corporate results in
the US, and the relaxation of tension about debt defaults
in Europe.

Wall Street led the rally, and markets in Europe were
able to follow the upward trend, with the strength of
the German economy providing significant support.
The best performance amongst the major markets
occurred in the UK, as investors continued to react
favourably to the proposed measures announced by
the new UK government to reduce the huge fiscal
deficit. The worst performance amongst the majors
occurred in the Japanese market as economic and
financial conditions in Japan continued to deteriorate.
Government bond markets received some support
during the past month from the easing of tensions in
the sovereign debt markets in Europe. The recent
“shock and awe” support operation agreed by member
of the euro-zone, and the decision by the European
Central Bank to buy the bonds of some of the weaker
countries, has provided some reassurance for investors;
but considerable uncertainties remain about prospects
for the bond market.

The Fed is suggesting that further stimulatory measures
might be necessary, whilst at the same time the ECB is
warning that reductions in spending programmes and
increases in taxes were now necessary, in Europe, but
also elsewhere in the industrialised world. Movements
in bond markets have therefore been fairly limited
over the month.

Currency Markets: The feature of the currency markets
has been the swing in sentiment. This has allowed the
euro to rally strongly, helped also by the improving
sentiment about sovereign debt defaults; and sterling
has also moved higher after the announcement of
measures to reduce the fiscal deficit in the UK and the
more favourable economic news on the UK economy.
The best performance; has been achieved by the yen,
as its “safe haven” status has been further enhanced
by the more serious problems elsewhere in the currency
markets.

Short-Term Interest Rates: There have been no changes
in short-term interest rates in the major financial
markets over the past month.

Commodity markets have benefited from the general
improvement in financial markets over the past month.
Significant gains have occurred in base metal prices,
and in the prices of wheat and coffee amongst the soft
commodities.

Precious metal prices have fallen back, and oil prices
are basically unchanged over the month after rallying
strongly from recent lows.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw Capital Management Investment Portfolio Performance 2010

We have made no changes in our portfolios this month. The swing in sentiment towards a more favourable view of prospects for the global economy is encouraging, and has been reflected in the recovery in equity prices.

We have therefore decided to maintain our holdings in Euro & US equities. We continue to retain our 10% holding in cash deposits as a contingency measure. The sovereign debt crisis remains a very serious threat, thus we have zero exposure to bonds. World Growth There has been much talk in recent weeks of a ‘double- dip’ recession, as some weak figures have come out. However wobbles of this type are fairly typical in a recovery from a severe recession. In our view the recovery remains in line with the path we have laid out before. This was for a world recovery that would be restrained by raw material shortages, which would put constant upward pressure on their prices. So we see world growth this year at around the 4.5% rate, well below the 5.5% figure being registered at the height of the boom; notice that the world is not ‘catching up’ the lost output of 2009, rather it is reverting to a slower growth path from the lower output base. Even with this pattern raw material prices have been very strong, with oil for example near the $80 a barrel mark.

The rises in these prices forced China and India to tighten policy and restrain their fast recoveries to prevent inflation. Even now in India inflation is not yet under control, having reached 13.9% in May, and policy will need to tighten further. On a lesser scale inflation has become threatening in a number of emerging market countries. So what we are seeing is that the fast-recovering countries mainly in East Asia are having to restrain their growth. Meanwhile in the OECD countries where inflation remains muted … or in the case of Japan deflation remains entrenched; growth is much weaker than in East Asia. The reason for the disparity of growth lies
in the disparity of productivity growth.

In East Asia the movement of people out of low- productivity agriculture into high-productivity manufacturing using the technology imported from advanced countries implies huge productivity growth. In advanced OECD countries productivity growth is dependent on innovation, a much slower process. So we observe a world in which productivity and so GDP growth is restrained generally by tight raw material supplies and in which the OECD countries growth relatively more slowly also. This adds up to a weak recovery in OECD countries, which is what we observe. The picture is not likely to change. It will take time for new technologies and discoveries to shift the shortage of raw materials; there are parallels here with the 1970s and 1980s when it took until the end of the 1980s to ease the acute shortages built up in the earlier decades. By 1990 for example oil per unit of real world GDP had
roughly halved from the mid-1970s and oil prices fell to low levels. Nevertheless this does not mean that employment growth need be weak or unemployment remains high.

Labour market flexibility … i.e. real wages falling relative to general productivity and willingness to adopt new practices … can encourage substitution of more labour for capital and raw materials. This is most obvious in service industries where there is plenty of scope for higher labour-intensiveness. Furthermore, service industries themselves can grow faster when labour is more flexible. So could this weakness turn into a double-dip recession in the OECD? It might seem so if growth there is restrained by tight raw materials and if also
governments are pursuing fiscal tightening; the only way might seem to be downward pressure on growth. But this is to leave out the role of monetary policy. In the OECD inflation targeting has been the unsung hero of macro policy; inflation has stayed down in the recovery and deflation kept at bay during the 2009 recession.

The reason lies in the effectiveness of inflation targeting in anchoring expectations. Surprisingly also, many inflation expectations mirrored in wage settlements and bond yields have remained around the 2% mark, reflecting the inflation targets set by most OECD central banks or governments. But it should not be a surprise; the targets have reflected a popular change in overall policy, towards outlawing
high and variable inflation. We had it, people did not like it, and policy changed to stop it during the 1980s or at latest by the early 1990s. In the debate over recession and public debt the idea
that inflation should be used to tackle either problem has barely been discussed, let alone advocated in any serious way.

What this has meant is that monetary policy has been quite unhampered by the fear of inflation in its aim to keep recovery on track. With OECD banking systems mostly in difficulties credit growth has been held down — in most countries it is hardly positive. So monetary policy has had to use unconventional
means to encourage investment and consumption. Interest rates on official lending have been kept close to zero and central banks have aggressively bought financial assets from the public, with the effect that the yields on these assets have been reduced.

These purchase programmes have now been stopped. But if recovery looks threatened they can be restarted and will again have a powerful effect through these asset markets.

Two decades ago such programmes would have raised inflation expectations. Today they are given the benefit of the doubt. Some people argue that they are quite safe because bank credit and broad money therefore are hardly growing; however, one cannot be sure that other financial channels are not replacing banks while they are so weak.

The truth seems to be that firms and people who need finance are mostly able to obtain it on quite cheap terms, so banks are being bypassed to a substantial degree. But inflation is not expected to result because it is widely (and correctly) believed that if inflation were to start rising monetary policy would be tightened. This belief does free central banks to take aggressive action to prop up the economy if it falters.

In short we think that the recovery will continue much along the current lines because from above it is held down by raw material shortages while from below it is held up by potentially aggressive monetary policy, with the power to more than offset the dampening from fiscal retrenchment.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.